We use cookies to improve our site and your experience. By continuing to browse on this website you accept the use of cookies.

GMC v Dr U

Claire Stevenson successfully represented Dr U before the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (‘MPTS’) who found that Dr U’s fitness to practise is no longer impaired. The MPTS revoked the order of suspension on Dr U’s registration with immediate effect.

In June 2021, at the previous hearing, the MPTS found that Dr U has been convicted, by another country, of death by negligence and reckless behaviour and sentenced to one year in prison which was suspended. The MPTS also found that Dr U did not declare his conviction whilst in the UK on the following three occasions: 1) when registering with the General Medical Council; 2) when registering as a locum with National Locums; and 3) during an appraisal with his UK employer.

As a result of not declaring his conviction, the MPTS found that Dr U had been dishonest on those three occasions.

With regards to the conviction, the MPTS determined that two of the essential elements for an offence of gross negligence manslaughter were absent from the offence for which Dr U was convicted. Accordingly, the offence, if committed in England and Wales, would not constitute a criminal offence. Therefore, the MPTS determined that Dr U was not impaired by reason of his conviction.

The MPTS was of the view that Dr U’s actions constituted departures from good medical practice guidance as identified, and that in being dishonest, he had breached one of the fundamental tenets of the profession. The MPTS considered that Dr U’s conduct fell far short of the standards of conduct reasonably to be expected of a doctor and therefore amounted to serious misconduct.

Dr U was found to be impaired by reason of misconduct and a four-month period of suspension was considered appropriate and necessary.

During the review proceedings, Claire Stevenson successfully represented Dr U.

The MPTS found that Dr U’s fitness to practise is no longer impaired. The order of suspension on Dr U’s registration was revoked with immediate effect.










Daniel Cohen successful in Court of Appeal case
Daniel Cohen successfully appealed to the Court of Appeal against his client's sentence for assault by penetration. The sentence was found to be manifestly excessive and accordingly, was reduced by 18 months.

Read more

Feryal Ertan appointed to FA National Serious Case Panel
Following her recent appointment to the FA Regional Discipline Panel, Feryal Ertan has also successfully been appointed to the FA’s National Serious Case Panel, for the forthcoming 2022-2023 football season.

Read more

Clara Sibanda’s drug supply client spared immediate custody following success at trial of issue
Clara Sibanda, instructed by Reeves & Co, secured a suspended sentence for a defendant convicted of possession with intent to supply Class A and B drugs, as well as possession of criminal property and an offensive weapon.

Read more

Samuel March secures acquittal of pro-Palestine protestor charged with possessing item with intent to destroy/damage property
Following a contested trial, Samuel March’s client was acquitted of possessing eight bottles of red paint, water balloons and a funnel with intent to destroy/damage property.

Read more

John Clifford secures convictions of three Defendants in a case concerning an Organised Criminal Network [‘OCN’]
John Clifford prosecuted this case, which involved a widespread conspiracy to supply Class A drugs and the seizure of two prohibited firearms, as well as 34 rounds of live ammunition, and over £5k in counterfeit cash.

Read more