We use cookies to improve our site and your experience. By continuing to browse on this website you accept the use of cookies.

Paul Douglass

Year of call: 1996

Areas of Work:






Paul Douglass is an experienced criminal practitioner, both defending and prosecuting. He is a grade 3 prosecutor and specialist rape advocate.
Paul has a successful practice defending and prosecuting a wide variety of serious cases including rape and other serious sexual offices, serious violence, drugs conspiracies, fraud and money laundering.

Defence Work
As a defence advocate, Paul has represented many hundreds of clients from a very wide variety of backgrounds. He has represented members of the armed forces, police officers, single parents, journalists, political activists, pensioners, business people, the unemployed, students, academics and a member of the clergy - to name but a few. He has represented clients from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds. He has also represented particularly vulnerable clients including minors and those with mental disorders and learning difficulties. Paul has defended in a wide variety of cases including murder, rape, armed robbery, other serious violent offences, sexual activity with a child, sexual assault, serious drug offences, including importation and conspiracy to supply large quantities of prohibited drugs. He has also defended clients accused of immigration offences, fraud and other offences of dishonesty.
Paul understands that being the accused in a criminal trial is one of the most stressful experiences one can face. He provides clients with comprehensive oral and written advice at an early stage in proceedings and does all he can to make sure that clients understand precisely what the case against them involves and, in the event that the matter goes to trial, how most effectively to prepare for it.

Recent Defence Cases
Paul successfully defended a client accused of rape at Reading Crown Court where the issue was one of consent. He successfully defended a serving member of the Parachute Regiment charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent to his estranged wife’s step-father. He has recently advised on appeal against conviction for murder.
Paul successfully represented a former police officer accused of fraud by false representation, it being alleged that she had dishonestly exaggerated the extent of injuries received in the course of her duty as a police officer for the purpose of making a fraudulent personal injury claim. The prosecution relied on 8 hours of covert surveillance footage of the defendant, as well as expert evidence provided by an associate professor or orthopaedics and the consultant orthopaedic surgeon who provided the report for her personal injury claim. After numerous hearings and extensive legal submissions, the Crown eventually offered no evidence and the client was formally acquitted. This case attracted media coverage.
Paul has recently been instructed in a multi-handed trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court in which he represented a client charged with conspiracy to supply £4.5 million of cannabis.

Prosecution Work
As a prosecution advocate, Paul has prosecuted many trials including those involving allegations of serious sexual offences, serious violence, including domestic violence, offences against children, gang related offences, firearms offences, arson with intent to endanger life, false imprisonment, kidnap, aggravated burglary, and armed robbery. He has also prosecuted serious drugs offences and offences of dishonesty.
Paul provides comprehensive written advice shortly after being instructed to prosecute a case. He endeavours in all cases to make email and/or telephone contact with the lawyer, the caseworker and the officer, in order to assist where necessary with the preparation of a case to trial or other disposal. Paul is acutely aware of the necessity for full and prompt disclosure of all material that is required to be disclosed.
Paul is also aware that appearing at court as a witness can be a very intimidating experience for anyone, but particularly so for those witnesses who are especially vulnerable. He takes care to introduce himself to witnesses in good time before they are required to give evidence, to explain his role, to explain court procedure and any other relevant matters, and generally to give reassurance.
Paul is registered with the Bar Council as having completed all stages of the Advocacy and the Vulnerable Training.

Recent Prosecution Cases
R v Afrisib and 4 others. Kingston Crown Court. Conspiracy to supply opium on a commercial scale throughout the UK. 5-week trial prosecuted as junior alone. All defendants convicted save one regarding whom the jury failed to reach a verdict. The principal defendant received a sentence of 20 years imprisonment.

R v B. Woolwich Crown Court. Sexual Activity with a Child Family Member. Step father of the complainant convicted of sexual activity with her when she was between the ages of 9 and 16.

R v Ravindranathan and two others. Snaresbrook Crown Court. Causing Grievous Bodily Harm with Intent. The victim, who sustained a fractured skull, broken arm, fractured 5th vertebra and multiple cuts and bruises, was a married man who had been having an affair for several months with an aunt of the first two defendants. The third defendant was a close friend of the first two defendants, and also their aunt’s lodger. After a ten-day trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court, the first two defendants were unanimously convicted of causing grievous bodily harm with intent. The first defendant was sentenced to 12 years imprisonment, the second to 11 years. The third defendant was unanimously convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm. He was sentenced to 4 years imprisonment.

R v J. Harrow Crown Court. Rape. A case involving multiple rapes and physical assaults by the defendant on his partner over a period of 4 years. The defendant was convicted unanimously on all counts. He received an extended sentence of imprisonment of 16 years.

R v B. Snaresbrook Crown Court. Sexual Activity with a Child Family Member. The defendant was accused of sexual activity with his 15 year old niece over a period of a year. After an 8-day trial, the jury convicted unanimously on 14 counts. The defendant was sentenced to 9 years imprisonment.

R v S. Kingston. Rape. The defendant (18) was convicted of raping a female (14). Having groomed her on social media, he raped her the first time they met.

R v K. Woolwich. Possession of a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence. The defendant discharged a sawn-off shotgun while pursuing members of a rival gang in South East London.

R v S. Kingston. Gross Indecency. Indecent assault. The defendant, in his late 70s at the time of trial, was unanimously convicted of sexual offences committed in the mid 1970s when he was in his early 30s and his male victim was aged between 11 and 13. He received a sentence of 7 years imprisonment.

R v M. Inner London. Sexual activity with a Child Family Member. The defendant was unanimously convicted of sexual activity with his step daughter when she was between the ages of 11 and 16.

R v R. Harrow. Attempted rape. The defendant (20 at the time of trial) was convicted of attempting to rape his half sister when he was 14 and she was 11.

South Eastern Circuit
Criminal Bar Association

Mr Paul Douglass is regulated by the Bar Standards Board, holds a current practising certificate and his details can be found on the BSB’s Barrister Register https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/regulatory-requirements/the-barristers'-register/
Mr Paul Douglass holds insurance cover for all legal services supplied through professional indemnity insurance with the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund (BMIF) The coverage is worldwide subject to their terms which are available on their website https://www.barmutual.co.uk/
Mr Paul Douglass is registered with the Information Commissioners office under the Data Protection Act https://ico.org.uk/
If you are not satisfied with the service that Mr Paul Douglass provides you can make a complaint to Chambers. Information on Chambers Complaints Procedure is available on Chambers website www.9kbw.com/about-us/complaints-procedure
If you are not satisfied with the response you receive from Chambers you may complain to the Legal Ombudsman (This must be done within the time limits set out) The contact details can be found on the Legal Ombudsman’s website http://www.legalombudsman.org.uk/


9 KBW Announcement on No Returns Policy
Because we believe that without decisive action by the Criminal Bar the MOJ will continue to systematically destroy the Criminal Justice System we at 9 KBW stand firm with our colleagues in taking that action.

Read more

Paul Douglass secures acquittal of foster carer in historic sex abuse trial
Paul Douglass represented a client in his 70s alleged to have sexually abused two females he and his wife fostered in the late 1990s. The female complainants came forward independently in 2013 and 2015 respectively and there was no evidence of collusion.

Read more

Claire Stevenson defends client in the first trial Snaresbrook Crown Court has heard, in the past 23 years, raising the defence of insanity
Claire acted for the defence in the trial of a 26 year old man at Snaresbrook Crown Court on the 3rd April 2018. The defendant was facing a three-count indictment, one of affray, and two of racially aggravated public order offences.

Read more

John Ojakovoh and Mark Sookram secure convictions in tax fraud trial at Luton Crown Court
John Ojakovoh (Leader) and Mark Sookram (Junior) prosecuted for the CPS Specialist Fraud Division in a trial at Luton Crown Court arising from an HMRC investigation into fraudulent Gift Aid claims made by the charity for which the defendant had acted as Pastor and Chair of Trustees.

Read more

9 KBW is delighted to announce success in applications to the Crown Prosecution Service Specialist Panels for the Serious Crime Group and Fraud
It is with great pleasure that we announce that Counsel John Clifford, John Ojakovoh and Graeme Molloy have been successful in their applications to join the Serious Crime Group and Daniel Cohen in his application to the Specialist Fraud Panel.

Read more