We use cookies to improve our site and your experience. By continuing to browse on this website you accept the use of cookies.

Charles Drinnan

Year of Call: 2016


Bar Professional Training Course (The University of Law)

LLB (Hons) (The University of Newcastle upon Tyne)

Areas Of Work:

Charles became a tenant in Chambers after successful completion of pupillage in March 2018.

Prior to joining Chambers Charles worked as a Civil Advocate on the South Eastern circuit, appearing on behalf of litigants in the County Court.

Charles Defends and Prosecutes in the Crown Court, Magistrates’ Court and Youth Court.

Charles is a Grade 1 CPS Panel Advocate.

Charles regularly Prosecutes for the National Probation Service.

Charles accepts instructions in Magistrates’ Court regulatory matters.

In the Magistrates’ Court Charles has a keen interest in driving matters.


Crown Court

R v A (Isleworth Crown Court) – currently instructed for the Defence in a 4-count burglary;

R v C (Luton Crown Court) – currently instructed for the Defence in a DNA-linked burglary;

R v C (Aylesbury Crown Court) – Successful appeal, persuading the Court to find exceptional hardship in a driving matter;

R v M (Central Criminal Court) – Prosecution of a sentence which received press coverage http://courtnewsuk.co.uk/tragedy-see-crooked-finance-manager-boss-says-judge/

R v M (Inner London Crown Court) – Successful prosecution of an appeal against conviction and sentence for possession of a bladed article;

R v G (Blackfriars Crown Court) – Successful prosecution of an appeal against conviction regarding rail fare evasion;

R v D (Isleworth Crown Court) – Successful appeal for post-conviction refusal of bail;

R v N (Croydon Crown Court) – Defended in a sentence resulting in 20-weeks custody for domestic burglary, possession of 15 wraps of cocaine, theft and driving matters.


Magistrates’ Court

Charles has represented the Isle of Wight Council in Education Law matters.

R v M (Stratford Magistrates’ Court) – Charles secured acquittal after submissions made under the M’Naughten insanity criteria in an assault case;

R v N (Ealing Magistrates’ Court) – Acquittal in a failing to provide information under S172 Road Traffic Act 1988;

R v F (Bromley Magistrates’ Court) – Charles persuaded the bench to impose a 56-day ban for an offence of speeding. The client was 54 mph over the speed limit;

R v D (Bromley Magistrates’ Court) – Successful newton in a speeding matter. Persuaded the Court the client was going 93mph in a 70-zone as opposed to a 50-zone;

R v S (Medway Magistrates’ Court) - Client was charged with S4 Public Order and linked offences of criminal damage and possessing an offensive weapon. The Crown’s case was ID by recognition and CCTV. Charles made submissions using the Turnbull guidelines. Client acquitted;

R v B, (Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court) - Client was charged with taking a vehicle without consent. Similarly, the Crown’s case was one of ID by recognition by a police officer. Charles made submissions under Turnbull without calling the Defendant. Client acquitted;

R v E (Bromley Magistrates’ Court) – Client was charged with possession of a bladed article. Charles made submissions on inconsistent DNA evidence. Client acquitted;

R v J (City of London Magistrates’ Court) – Charles made submissions regarding an incorrect charge being laid in a handling stolen goods matter. Client acquitted;

R v B (Camberwell Green Magistrates’ Court) Client acquitted after a successful half-time submission in a possession of a bladed article matter.


Youth Court

R v L (Croydon Youth Court) – Charles secured acquittal in a vehicle interference matter;

R v H (Uxbridge Youth Court) – Charles persuaded the bench to impose a referral order in lieu of custody in a GBH matter;

R v M (Uxbridge Youth Court) – Client was charged with an assault on a police officer. Client acquitted.



Charles is currently instructed in an appeal regarding failures to comply with an enforcement notice under The Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005.

Charles is currently instructed in a forfeiture hearing for the Home Office.



Prior to joining chambers Charles obtained extensive experience in the County Court. Charles dealt with a broad spectrum of civil matters including case management hearings, residential landlord and tenant disputes, trespassers, charging orders, determinations, return of goods and consumer credit, mortgage possession and personal injury hearings.



Charles enjoys rugby, skiing and going to the gym. He enjoys music and heading back to Yorkshire when time permits.


Mr Charles Drinnan is regulated by the Bar Standards Board, holds a current practising certificate and his details can be found on the BSB’s Barrister Register https://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/regulatory-requirements/the-barristers'-register/

Mr Charles Drinnan holds insurance cover for all legal services supplied through professional indemnity insurance with the Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund (BMIF) The coverage is worldwide subject to their terms which are available on their website https://www.barmutual.co.uk/

Mr Charles Drinnan is registered with the Information Commissioners office under the Data Protection Act https://ico.org.uk/

If you are not satisfied with the service that Mr Charles Drinnan provides you can make a complaint to Chambers. Information on Chambers Complaints Procedure is available on Chambers website www.9kbw.com/about-us/complaints-procedure

If you are not satisfied with the response you receive from Chambers you may complain to the Legal Ombudsman (This must be done within the time limits set out) The contact details can be found on the Legal Ombudsman’s website http://www.legalombudsman.org.uk/


9 KBW Announcement on No Returns Policy
Because we believe that without decisive action by the Criminal Bar the MOJ will continue to systematically destroy the Criminal Justice System we at 9 KBW stand firm with our colleagues in taking that action.

Read more

Paul Douglass secures acquittal of foster carer in historic sex abuse trial
Paul Douglass represented a client in his 70s alleged to have sexually abused two females he and his wife fostered in the late 1990s. The female complainants came forward independently in 2013 and 2015 respectively and there was no evidence of collusion.

Read more

Claire Stevenson defends client in the first trial Snaresbrook Crown Court has heard, in the past 23 years, raising the defence of insanity
Claire acted for the defence in the trial of a 26 year old man at Snaresbrook Crown Court on the 3rd April 2018. The defendant was facing a three-count indictment, one of affray, and two of racially aggravated public order offences.

Read more

John Ojakovoh and Mark Sookram secure convictions in tax fraud trial at Luton Crown Court
John Ojakovoh (Leader) and Mark Sookram (Junior) prosecuted for the CPS Specialist Fraud Division in a trial at Luton Crown Court arising from an HMRC investigation into fraudulent Gift Aid claims made by the charity for which the defendant had acted as Pastor and Chair of Trustees.

Read more

9 KBW is delighted to announce success in applications to the Crown Prosecution Service Specialist Panels for the Serious Crime Group and Fraud
It is with great pleasure that we announce that Counsel John Clifford, John Ojakovoh and Graeme Molloy have been successful in their applications to join the Serious Crime Group and Daniel Cohen in his application to the Specialist Fraud Panel.

Read more